I wouldn't call people who hire whores, "Innocent people," but I would say the seriousness of what they depends on what they paid for and if they know what brought them that opportunity.
It also came out that the pimp here was using this for the political control of a foreign country-treason.
From the private to the political life, I would agree with the twisted morals and in the problem Soren Kierkegaard saw in the withholding of decisions being worse than indifference.
Considering that opposing ethics have been constructed to promote an empty materialism, I don't see how insisting that the New World Order talked about by Regan-Obama must stay up is not worse than seeing what will happen when the approach to anarchy swings back towards order again.
One way to look at Gates, Epstein, the tech bros, the Brit ‘royal’ family and the entire pedo experimental world wide interlocking rings, has them as returning Atlantean evil sorcerers doing the same dark merde. AI is a twisted Atlantean crystal.
The idea of horrible chaos if over 40% of the govt is arrested is childish. That number was put out by the Q op. When our govt has shut down in the past, no one noticed.
Still, it would be very wise to review what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed, and have things that people will trade for, like coffee and bacon. . .
Another perspective is to question whether society would collapse entirely or would it just be the part protecting pedophiles, and hopefully senseless war (it can be debated whether any war makes sense), as well, that would collapse?
The US was founded on principles that kings are not divine rulers, but that the divine endowed each of us with the right of self determination.
Whatever British culture apologists may say about it being the birthplace of freedom, English loyalists during the American Revolution, as well as other British subjects, thought the idea that you didn’t need a king was preposterous.
It was absurd to even debate it, they said.
Thing is, calling for an end to the monarchy in England is still technically illegal, and there are no written free speech protections, outside of signing onto an EU charter of human rights that ensconces freedom of expression, not speech.
The UK has at times adopted free speech norms, but as can be seen currently, those are easily tossed aside when speech exists that questions or threatens the rule of the ruling class.
Religions blend spirituality with legal frameworks. The English king is also the head of its church. Religious courts of sharia are the law of the land in many Muslim dominated countries.
However, the breadth of interpretation possible in very old religious texts, partly because of cultural ambiguity between the past and present, allows for backsliding into fundamentalist prejudices and primitive practices, like child marriage, despite the social evolution of ideas like individual liberty.
The US experimented with putting a backstop on the devolution of the enlightenment principles that evolved from new interpretations of Christianity, which occurred across much of Europe, including Britain.
Though derided as corrupt, militaristic and destined to fail, the Constitution and its amendments enshrined in a spiritual and legal framework, rights endowed by the Creator, not an extant god at the time, but not written in any religious book.
We can continue to evolve from there, whether society collapses in its present form or not.
Perhaps, as the framers did, it is an opportunity to build a better framework for our present and the future.
I wouldn't call people who hire whores, "Innocent people," but I would say the seriousness of what they depends on what they paid for and if they know what brought them that opportunity.
It also came out that the pimp here was using this for the political control of a foreign country-treason.
From the private to the political life, I would agree with the twisted morals and in the problem Soren Kierkegaard saw in the withholding of decisions being worse than indifference.
Considering that opposing ethics have been constructed to promote an empty materialism, I don't see how insisting that the New World Order talked about by Regan-Obama must stay up is not worse than seeing what will happen when the approach to anarchy swings back towards order again.
I think things have hit rock bottom...in terms of those in charge....but I am sure things will actually get worse before they get better : (
One way to look at Gates, Epstein, the tech bros, the Brit ‘royal’ family and the entire pedo experimental world wide interlocking rings, has them as returning Atlantean evil sorcerers doing the same dark merde. AI is a twisted Atlantean crystal.
The idea of horrible chaos if over 40% of the govt is arrested is childish. That number was put out by the Q op. When our govt has shut down in the past, no one noticed.
Still, it would be very wise to review what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed, and have things that people will trade for, like coffee and bacon. . .
I am just fine with the number being 99% of the replacement of the service nobility, if that is the traitors and more explicit worst of the worst.
Let it burn is the best title here. Accountability for actions. Let’s
restart the game
Another perspective is to question whether society would collapse entirely or would it just be the part protecting pedophiles, and hopefully senseless war (it can be debated whether any war makes sense), as well, that would collapse?
The US was founded on principles that kings are not divine rulers, but that the divine endowed each of us with the right of self determination.
Whatever British culture apologists may say about it being the birthplace of freedom, English loyalists during the American Revolution, as well as other British subjects, thought the idea that you didn’t need a king was preposterous.
It was absurd to even debate it, they said.
Thing is, calling for an end to the monarchy in England is still technically illegal, and there are no written free speech protections, outside of signing onto an EU charter of human rights that ensconces freedom of expression, not speech.
The UK has at times adopted free speech norms, but as can be seen currently, those are easily tossed aside when speech exists that questions or threatens the rule of the ruling class.
Religions blend spirituality with legal frameworks. The English king is also the head of its church. Religious courts of sharia are the law of the land in many Muslim dominated countries.
However, the breadth of interpretation possible in very old religious texts, partly because of cultural ambiguity between the past and present, allows for backsliding into fundamentalist prejudices and primitive practices, like child marriage, despite the social evolution of ideas like individual liberty.
The US experimented with putting a backstop on the devolution of the enlightenment principles that evolved from new interpretations of Christianity, which occurred across much of Europe, including Britain.
Though derided as corrupt, militaristic and destined to fail, the Constitution and its amendments enshrined in a spiritual and legal framework, rights endowed by the Creator, not an extant god at the time, but not written in any religious book.
We can continue to evolve from there, whether society collapses in its present form or not.
Perhaps, as the framers did, it is an opportunity to build a better framework for our present and the future.