Yesterday, for fun, I grabbed what I could of the Epstein list—over a thousand names. A thousand names linked to a man whose very presence seems to radiate rot. Just a few minutes of digging, just a five-minute conversation with Chat about the repercussions of Bill Clinton's connection to Epstein, and the picture began to clarify. Not through direct proof—those rarely survive public scrutiny—but through implication. Through pattern. Through the unmistakable stench of normalization. If that level of influence is merely a whiff of the real structure, then the ruling class is not compromised. It is owned.
And then today, on X, a quote surfaced:
BREAKING: Trump said the Epstein files “could destroy” innocent people, Bill O’Reilly recently claimed, per Newsweek.
To which another account replied:
It would literally destabilize the world.
2/3rds of Congress & a large portion of the world's most powerful people would be imprisoned.
Which basically means society would at least partially collapse.
Let’s pause there. Society would “collapse.” The implicit assumption is that this would be bad. But who is this society working for, exactly? The architects of the status quo treat collapse as the ultimate threat—but for many of us, collapse has already happened. The promise was broken long ago.
The institutions are hollow. The justice system is gamed. The media serves as a spellcaster for the elite. Political parties perform theatre to distract from the fact that both wings flap in service of the same beast. And if two-thirds of Congress—two-thirds—could be implicated through real evidence, then that’s not a bug in the system. It is the system.
So I ask again: why on earth would I not want it to collapse?
Collapse is not the end. Collapse is what happens when a structure no longer has the integrity to bear the weight of truth. It’s not annihilation—it’s exposure. The scaffolding of corruption can't support itself when light floods in. And perhaps that's the real fear behind comments like Trump's—that truth doesn’t just destroy individuals. It destroys illusions. It burns down the architecture of deceit.
We're told that collapse would harm us. But for whom, really, would it be harmful? The people who’ve already been harmed—by austerity, surveillance, poisoned food, endless wars, stolen futures? Or the ones who’ve orchestrated those conditions while hiding behind facades of diplomacy and philanthropy?
We are living in a simulation of morality, where power is insulated from consequence. And yet we’re expected to protect that simulation, to pretend that unmasking the truth would somehow be worse than continuing the lie. But here’s the thing: If a civilization can’t survive the exposure of its own crimes, it doesn’t deserve to survive in its current form.
So again I ask, without sarcasm, without rage, just clarity:
Why on earth would I not want it to collapse?
Let it collapse. Let the truth be known. Let the parasites scramble and the scaffolds fall. From the rubble, something new can be born—something with integrity, or at least the space for it. Because staying in a corrupt world doesn't protect us. It just prolongs the sickness.
Collapse is not our enemy.
Corruption is.
p.s. we have some awesome new offerings for the non materially minded : )
AND OUR SUMMER SALE IS NOW ON!!!!
Get and additional 15% Off with Coupon Code “SUMMER15”
THE ACADEMY OF INVISIBLE ARTS
New course : She Who ReMembers
https://www.academyofinvisiblearts.com/remember
She remembers... like Isis.
Not in the mind, but in the marrow.
Not in the text, but in the temple of her body.
More courses : https://www.academyofinvisiblearts.com/
and as always MAGICAL EGYPT
https://www.magicalegyptstore.com/
I wouldn't call people who hire whores, "Innocent people," but I would say the seriousness of what they depends on what they paid for and if they know what brought them that opportunity.
It also came out that the pimp here was using this for the political control of a foreign country-treason.
From the private to the political life, I would agree with the twisted morals and in the problem Soren Kierkegaard saw in the withholding of decisions being worse than indifference.
Considering that opposing ethics have been constructed to promote an empty materialism, I don't see how insisting that the New World Order talked about by Regan-Obama must stay up is not worse than seeing what will happen when the approach to anarchy swings back towards order again.
One way to look at Gates, Epstein, the tech bros, the Brit ‘royal’ family and the entire pedo experimental world wide interlocking rings, has them as returning Atlantean evil sorcerers doing the same dark merde. AI is a twisted Atlantean crystal.
The idea of horrible chaos if over 40% of the govt is arrested is childish. That number was put out by the Q op. When our govt has shut down in the past, no one noticed.
Still, it would be very wise to review what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed, and have things that people will trade for, like coffee and bacon. . .